Review of the employee performance evaluation system at the Directorate General of Taxes

Its effectiveness and employee satisfaction level

Authors

  • Anies Said Basalamah Badan Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Keuangan
  • Herru Widiatmanti Badan Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Keuangan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52869/st.v5i1.429

Keywords:

performance evaluation system, DGT, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA)

Abstract

This quantitative research seeks to determine the effectiveness of the Directorate General of Taxes (DGT) performance
evaluation system, measure how satisfied the employees are, and to prove differences among different categories of
employees. This research is an extension of the study by Widiatmanti (2020) on 1,587 DGT employees. Analysis of
Variance (ANOVA) and Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) were used to analyze the data in addition to descriptive data
analysis. Generally, respondents feel the system is quite effective, and they are quite satisfied, except for three variables
that most respondents strongly disagree with and relate to the performance status of SABCD and the level 1 and level
2 ranking sessions. ANOVA method indicates that there are indeed differences among different categories of employees,
while EFA method reveals that despite seven insignificant variables, none of them suggests the need to change DGT
Regulation 12/PJ/2018, including its SABCD performance status. However, the need for change or adjustments arises
because there are provisions at higher levels of regulation: Government Regulation and two ministerial decrees.
Therefore, we suggest that the use of forced rank in the SABCD performance status is abolished and replaced mainly
due to excellent, moderate, and poor performances.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-31

How to Cite

Basalamah, A. S., & Widiatmanti, H. (2023). Review of the employee performance evaluation system at the Directorate General of Taxes: Its effectiveness and employee satisfaction level. Scientax: Jurnal Kajian Ilmiah Perpajakan Indonesia, 5(1), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.52869/st.v5i1.429